Veterans administration cooperative dental implant study—comparisons between fixed partial dentures supported by blade-vent implants and removable partial dentures. Part III: Comparisons of masticatory scores between two treatment modalities
Identifieur interne : 005509 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 005508; suivant : 005510Veterans administration cooperative dental implant study—comparisons between fixed partial dentures supported by blade-vent implants and removable partial dentures. Part III: Comparisons of masticatory scores between two treatment modalities
Auteurs : Krishan K. Kapur [États-Unis]Source :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1991.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment teeth, Average patient, Average person, Baseline, Baseline interval, Blade implant, Blade implants, Carrot, Complete series, Dent, Dental implant, Dental implant study, Dental implants, Dental service, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous conditions, Entry masticatory scores, Experimental side, Finer particle size, Fpd, Implant, Intact dentition, Kapur, Kennedy class, Loma, Loma linda, Mastication, Masticatory, Masticatory ability, Masticatory function, Masticatory performance, Masticatory performance scores, Masticatory performances, Masticatory scores, Masticatory tests, Medical center, Nonexperimental, Nonexperimental side, Nonexperimental sides, Older group, Older patients, Partial dentures, Peanuts, Performance gains, Performance improvements, Performance scores, Periodontal, Periodontal health, Posterior teeth, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Removable, Removable prosthodontics, Right side, Rpds, Scores, Side performances, Side right side, Significant differences, Subgroup, Success rate, Test food, Test foods, Threshold performance, Threshold performances, Treatment completion, Treatment failures, Treatment groups, Treatment modalities, Ucla school, Veterans administration, Younger group, Younger patients.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment teeth, Average patient, Average person, Baseline, Baseline interval, Blade implant, Blade implants, Carrot, Complete series, Dent, Dental implant, Dental implant study, Dental implants, Dental service, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous conditions, Entry masticatory scores, Experimental side, Finer particle size, Fpd, Implant, Intact dentition, Kapur, Kennedy class, Loma, Loma linda, Mastication, Masticatory, Masticatory ability, Masticatory function, Masticatory performance, Masticatory performance scores, Masticatory performances, Masticatory scores, Masticatory tests, Medical center, Nonexperimental, Nonexperimental side, Nonexperimental sides, Older group, Older patients, Partial dentures, Peanuts, Performance gains, Performance improvements, Performance scores, Periodontal, Periodontal health, Posterior teeth, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Removable, Removable prosthodontics, Right side, Rpds, Scores, Side performances, Side right side, Significant differences, Subgroup, Success rate, Test food, Test foods, Threshold performance, Threshold performances, Treatment completion, Treatment failures, Treatment groups, Treatment modalities, Ucla school, Veterans administration, Younger group, Younger patients.
Abstract
Abstract: Five Veterans Administration Medical Centers participated in a study to determine the comparative influence of fixed partial dentures (FDPs) supported by endosteal blade implants and removable partial dentures (RPDs) on masticatory performance. The study design, methodology, and success rates have been described in Parts I and II. A total of 232 patients received comprehensive dental care, including RPDs for 118 patients and FPDs for 114. Three standardized masticatory tests were made with peanuts and carrots before treatment. These tests were repeated at 16 weeks following RPD or implant insertion and thereafter at 6, 18, 36, and 60 months. At entry, there were no significant differences in performance scores and chewing time and strokes taken to reach the swallowing threshold between the RPD and FPD groups (p > 0.05). After treatment completion, FPDs and RPDs significantly improved the masticatory ability of patients with Kennedy class I or class II edentulous conditions (p < 0.001). The improvements in performance scores for both test foods were slightly better in the RPD group than in the FPD group, although none of the 30 mean differences was significant (p > 0.05). After the baseline period to 60 months, only slight changes in performance scores were observed for both groups. RPDs and FPDs were comparable in improving the chewing efficiency of patients with Kennedy class I and class II partially edentulous conditions.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90174-U
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9E3B34C8FBCA86B2A3751B815EF9E0FC948A0E64Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Veterans administration cooperative dental implant study—comparisons between fixed partial dentures supported by blade-vent implants and removable partial dentures. Part III: Comparisons of masticatory scores between two treatment modalities</title><author><name sortKey="Kapur, Krishan K" sort="Kapur, Krishan K" uniqKey="Kapur K" first="Krishan K." last="Kapur">Krishan K. Kapur</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9E3B34C8FBCA86B2A3751B815EF9E0FC948A0E64</idno><date when="1991" year="1991">1991</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3913(91)90174-U</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9E3B34C8FBCA86B2A3751B815EF9E0FC948A0E64/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004F13</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004F13</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">004F13</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">005509</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">005509</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Veterans administration cooperative dental implant study—comparisons between fixed partial dentures supported by blade-vent implants and removable partial dentures. Part III: Comparisons of masticatory scores between two treatment modalities</title><author><name sortKey="Kapur, Krishan K" sort="Kapur, Krishan K" uniqKey="Kapur K" first="Krishan K." last="Kapur">Krishan K. Kapur</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Veterans Administration Medical Center, West Los Angeles, Calif.</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Calif.</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1991">1991</date><biblScope unit="volume">65</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="272">272</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="283">283</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Average patient</term><term>Average person</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Baseline interval</term><term>Blade implant</term><term>Blade implants</term><term>Carrot</term><term>Complete series</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implant</term><term>Dental implant study</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental service</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous conditions</term><term>Entry masticatory scores</term><term>Experimental side</term><term>Finer particle size</term><term>Fpd</term><term>Implant</term><term>Intact dentition</term><term>Kapur</term><term>Kennedy class</term><term>Loma</term><term>Loma linda</term><term>Mastication</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory ability</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Masticatory performance scores</term><term>Masticatory performances</term><term>Masticatory scores</term><term>Masticatory tests</term><term>Medical center</term><term>Nonexperimental</term><term>Nonexperimental side</term><term>Nonexperimental sides</term><term>Older group</term><term>Older patients</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Peanuts</term><term>Performance gains</term><term>Performance improvements</term><term>Performance scores</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal health</term><term>Posterior teeth</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Removable</term><term>Removable prosthodontics</term><term>Right side</term><term>Rpds</term><term>Scores</term><term>Side performances</term><term>Side right side</term><term>Significant differences</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Test food</term><term>Test foods</term><term>Threshold performance</term><term>Threshold performances</term><term>Treatment completion</term><term>Treatment failures</term><term>Treatment groups</term><term>Treatment modalities</term><term>Ucla school</term><term>Veterans administration</term><term>Younger group</term><term>Younger patients</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Average patient</term><term>Average person</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Baseline interval</term><term>Blade implant</term><term>Blade implants</term><term>Carrot</term><term>Complete series</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implant</term><term>Dental implant study</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental service</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous conditions</term><term>Entry masticatory scores</term><term>Experimental side</term><term>Finer particle size</term><term>Fpd</term><term>Implant</term><term>Intact dentition</term><term>Kapur</term><term>Kennedy class</term><term>Loma</term><term>Loma linda</term><term>Mastication</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory ability</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Masticatory performance scores</term><term>Masticatory performances</term><term>Masticatory scores</term><term>Masticatory tests</term><term>Medical center</term><term>Nonexperimental</term><term>Nonexperimental side</term><term>Nonexperimental sides</term><term>Older group</term><term>Older patients</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Peanuts</term><term>Performance gains</term><term>Performance improvements</term><term>Performance scores</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal health</term><term>Posterior teeth</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Removable</term><term>Removable prosthodontics</term><term>Right side</term><term>Rpds</term><term>Scores</term><term>Side performances</term><term>Side right side</term><term>Significant differences</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Test food</term><term>Test foods</term><term>Threshold performance</term><term>Threshold performances</term><term>Treatment completion</term><term>Treatment failures</term><term>Treatment groups</term><term>Treatment modalities</term><term>Ucla school</term><term>Veterans administration</term><term>Younger group</term><term>Younger patients</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Five Veterans Administration Medical Centers participated in a study to determine the comparative influence of fixed partial dentures (FDPs) supported by endosteal blade implants and removable partial dentures (RPDs) on masticatory performance. The study design, methodology, and success rates have been described in Parts I and II. A total of 232 patients received comprehensive dental care, including RPDs for 118 patients and FPDs for 114. Three standardized masticatory tests were made with peanuts and carrots before treatment. These tests were repeated at 16 weeks following RPD or implant insertion and thereafter at 6, 18, 36, and 60 months. At entry, there were no significant differences in performance scores and chewing time and strokes taken to reach the swallowing threshold between the RPD and FPD groups (p > 0.05). After treatment completion, FPDs and RPDs significantly improved the masticatory ability of patients with Kennedy class I or class II edentulous conditions (p < 0.001). The improvements in performance scores for both test foods were slightly better in the RPD group than in the FPD group, although none of the 30 mean differences was significant (p > 0.05). After the baseline period to 60 months, only slight changes in performance scores were observed for both groups. RPDs and FPDs were comparable in improving the chewing efficiency of patients with Kennedy class I and class II partially edentulous conditions.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><noRegion><name sortKey="Kapur, Krishan K" sort="Kapur, Krishan K" uniqKey="Kapur K" first="Krishan K." last="Kapur">Krishan K. Kapur</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005509 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 005509 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9E3B34C8FBCA86B2A3751B815EF9E0FC948A0E64
|texte= Veterans administration cooperative dental implant study—comparisons between fixed partial dentures supported by blade-vent implants and removable partial dentures. Part III: Comparisons of masticatory scores between two treatment modalities
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |